14.2.2023
27.4.2023
Insight
5 minutes

Taxation of deceased estates and the double death conundrum – has the Commissioner offered a way forward?

Examining the issue of double taxation on deceased estates and exploring possible solutions.

Taxation of deceased estates and the double death conundrum – has the Commissioner offered a way forward?
Key Insights
  • Generally, no capital gains tax (‘CGT’) applies where an individual dies and their CGT asset passes to their legal personal representative (‘LPR’) or a beneficiary of their estate due to a particular exemption in the tax legislation. Instead, any CGT liability is deferred until a subsequent disposal of the asset by the LPR or beneficiary.

  • Where a beneficiary dies before an asset passes to them (e.g. because probate has not yet been granted or the estate is still under administration), the passing of the asset from the LPR of the estate of the first deceased to the LPR of the estate of the deceased beneficiary or a beneficiary of their estate can fall through the cracks such that the exemption does not apply. This scenario is particularly common where elderly spouses are involved, as the surviving spouse can often pass away within a short space of time after the death of their late spouse.

  • A recent private ruling reveals that the Commissioner of Taxation may provide an administrative patch to the gap in the legislation through the private ruling process. Depending on the facts and circumstances, it may be worthwhile for an LPR, trustee of a testamentary trust or beneficiary in these circumstances to seek a private ruling on the matter.

Generally, a capital gain or loss arising from the death of an Australian resident owner of a capital gains tax (CGT) asset is disregarded under Division 128 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth). Instead, the capital gain or loss is deferred (or ‘rolled-over’) until a subsequent disposal of the property by the LPR or beneficiary, with the LPR or beneficiary being deemed to have acquired the asset as at the deceased’s date of death at a cost base determined in accordance with the tax legislation.

Significantly, Division 128 only applies in respect of assets owned by the deceased ‘just before’ they died. This gives rise to difficulties in the context of a ‘double death’ scenario, where the beneficiary of a deceased estate dies before the CGT asset passes to them. In this circumstance, Division 128 may not apply where CGT assets pass from a deceased estate to the estate of a beneficiary and then to the beneficiaries of this second deceased estate.

A new private ruling issued by the Commissioner on the CGT implications arising from a double death situation reveals that the Commissioner may now be inclined towards overcoming the inadvertent tax consequences arising from a double death scenario through the private ruling process. In the vast majority of cases, overcoming these consequences will be in the taxpayer’s favour; however, in some cases, it may not be. Given this, and in the absence of binding authority on the matter, the appropriate strategy will turn on the particular facts and circumstances and the risk profile of the parties involved.

In view of the private ruling and the Commissioner’s objective of promoting consistency of treatment for all taxpayers, taxpayers in a double death situation should consider applying for a private ruling to obtain clarity on the operation of Division 128 to their circumstances. Where appropriate to the taxpayer’s circumstances, it may be that, through the process, the double death conundrum may be successfully navigated.

Please click on the following link to find out more about this recent development and what this could mean for you: click here.

------------------------

This article in no way constitutes legal advice. It is general in nature and is the opinion of the author only. You should seek legal advice tailored to your individual circumstances before acting on anything related to this article.

Episode:
Episode:
Featured Guest
References & Additional Resources

This podcast in no way constitutes legal advice. It is general in nature and is the opinion of the author only. You should seek legal advice tailored to your individual circumstances before acting on anything related to this podcast.

Related FAQ
No items found.
Feedback

If you enjoyed this episode and have a question or suggestion for future episodes, we’d love to hear from you. Email us here.

Book an Appointment
Contact

Join Australian professionals who get monthly insights from Velocity Legal.

Archana Manapakkam
Icon

Special Counsel

Archana Manapakkam

Guide to Startups (including Legal Basics, Capital Raising and Future Opportunities)

Podcast

19.3.24

28.2.2024

Guide to Startups (including Legal Basics, Capital Raising and Future Opportunities)

Explain That is a podcast by Velocity Legal which unravels complex legal concepts and makes them easy to understand. Our host Andrew Henshaw (Managing Director of Velocity Legal) talks to a range of specialists who share their expertise and provide practical guidance.