Listen
Close
Back
Commercial
Disputes
Employment
Insolvency
Estates
Family
Tax
Am I in a De Facto Relationship? The Legal Threshold and Why it Matters
No items found.
Key Insights
A relationship can be de facto even if the parties do not describe it that way. The court looks at the practical reality of the relationship, not just the label the parties use. Separate homes, separate bank accounts or the absence of a formal commitment do not automatically prevent a finding that a de facto relationship existed. The question is whether, looking at all the circumstances, the parties were living together on a genuine domestic basis.
The two-year guideline is not the whole test. Many people assume a relationship only becomes de facto after two years. That is not always correct. A relationship may be recognised earlier where the parties have a child together, where one party has made substantial contributions, or where the relationship has been registered. Those contributions may be financial, domestic or connected with caring responsibilities.
De facto status can create immediate financial consequences. Once the threshold is met, the parties may face property settlement obligations, disclosure requirements and potential spousal maintenance claims. This can be especially significant where one person has contributed to property, supported the other financially, cared for children or become integrated into the other person’s household. Early advice and clear records can help reduce uncertainty if the relationship later ends.
A relationship does not need to look like a marriage to have family law consequences.
Many couples share parts of their lives without marrying and may not realise that their relationship already meets the legal threshold for a de facto relationship. Once that threshold is met, the parties may be treated in a similar way to a married couple for property settlement and financial matters under the Family Law Act.
In this episode of Explain That by Velocity Legal, Andrew Henshaw is joined by Shannon Hilton and Rohan Kelly to discuss how de facto relationships are assessed in practice, why the labels used by the parties are not decisive, and the financial consequences that can follow if a relationship is found to be de facto.
The discussion covers:
- what a de facto relationship means under Australian family law;
- why there is no single test for determining de facto status;
- how courts assess whether parties were living together on a genuine domestic basis;
- why living together full time or combining finances is not always required;
- common misconceptions about the two-year guideline;
- when a de facto relationship may be recognised earlier, including where there is a child, substantial contributions or registration;
- how de facto status can affect property settlement and spousal maintenance;
- why contributions can be difficult to assess in shorter relationships;
- what happens where the existence of the relationship itself is disputed;
- why disclosure may be limited until the threshold issue is determined; and
- practical steps people can take if the nature of the relationship is unclear.
A practical discussion for people in new relationships, blended families, second relationships, separated couples and advisers dealing with property, maintenance or asset protection issues where de facto status may be disputed.
For advice on de facto relationships, property settlement, spousal maintenance, Binding Financial Agreements or family law risk, contact Velocity Legal’s Family Law team.
This podcast in no way constitutes legal advice. It is general in nature and is the opinion of the author only. You should seek legal advice tailored to your individual circumstances before acting on anything related to this podcast.
Move your business forward with Explain That. Reduce your risk, and seize opportunity.
Join 'Explain That', where Australian professionals get monthly insights from Velocity Legal.
Thank you! You are now subscribed.
Oops! Something went wrong. Please fill in the required fields and try again.
.jpg)